EMMITSBURG, Md. –Mayor James E. Hoover has rescinded
his attempted veto of the board of commissioners’ decision
to amend the town charter, allowing a fifth commissioner and
removing the mayor’s ability to vote as a member of
the board.
According
to board President Christopher V. Staiger, the mayoral veto
was rescinded because state regulations prohibit the head
of the executive body from vetoing approved charter changes.
The mayor’s veto was issued Jan. 24; the notice that
the veto was being rescinded was sent out Jan. 26.
A special
meeting of the board of commissioners set for Feb. 1 to
discuss an attempt to overturn the mayoral veto has been
cancelled.
In
a memo to the staff and commissioners, Mayor Hoover stated,
“After further staff review and verification with
the town attorney, state law prohibits me from vetoing a
charter resolution. Therefore, my veto of Resolution 2006-01R
is hereby rescinded.”
As
a result, the only way to reverse the board’s decisions
approving the fifth commissioner and nullifying the mayoral
vote on the board would be a petition for a referendum,
which would allow residents to decide.
Because
adding a fifth commissioner requires a change in the town
charter, residents have 40 calendar days to challenge the
decision by filing a petition for referendum, forcing the
issue to a public vote if enough signatures were gathered.
If no such objection occurs within 40 days, the change will
go into effect on the 50th calendar day from passage, in
time for the seat to be open for the town’s April
25 election.
The board of commissioners had voted 4-0-1 at the Jan. 18
town meeting, Hoover abstaining, to amend the town charter
to allow for the creation of a fifth commissioner seat on
the board. And in a 5-0 vote, the board and mayor voted
to amend the law to remove the ability of the mayor to vote
as a member of the board of commissioners.
The
mayor vetoed both actions on Jan. 24. Hoover said his reasons
included the “lack of response” from board members
when asked “how they thought amending the charter
would change the role of the mayor,” and because the
issue of when the fifth commissioner would be elected was
not addressed at the final vote.
Board
President Christopher V. Staiger told The Dispatch
Jan. 25, “I got the feeling after the meeting the
veto was impending. My goal was to remove some of this controversy.
My opinion has always been the complications came from the
(original) revisions to the charter (when the mayoral powers
were inserted).”
“If
we want a fifth vote to avoid tie votes, the way to do it
is to have a fifth commissioner. We are even increasing
the threshold of the votes necessary to overturn a veto.
In the end all power is invested in the town council.”
Staiger said.
The
mayor had said that he chose to use his voting power under
the charter to break ties and to increase the board’s
efficiency in conducting town business.